WRNHA Home Page   Washington State Republican
   National Hispanic Assembly




The president hosted a meeting at the White House this past Thursday with Republican Hispanic candidates from across the nation. Below are his remarks at that event.
Additional news coverage on the event can be found at:
EFE. http://www.hispaniconline.com/topnews/article.html?SMContentIndex=2&SMContentSet=0
AP: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A39944-2002Oct3.html

Pedro Celis
Republican National Hispanic Assembly
Washington State Chairman

President Bush Speeches and Statements     THE WHITE HOUSE

                            REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
                              TO HISPANIC LEADERS

     THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all for coming and welcome to the White House
compound.  It's my honor to represent -- to welcome you all here, to thank you
for serving your communities and thank you for serving your nation.

     Some of you are seeking office for the first time, and I think you'll find
this to be a fantastic experience.  Some of you have sought and won, and I want
to congratulate you for that, and thanks for serving.  My job is, of course, to
promote the diversity of America, to herald the fact that one of the great
strengths of America is the fact that we're diverse; and that we welcome
diversity in this country and we welcome diversity and celebrate diversity in
all kinds of ways.

     And one of the ways is that we've got Hispanic Heritage Month, and we
recognize Hispanic Heritage Month here at the White House.  And we do so in a
variety of way.  And one way, of course, is to remind people that I picked some
fabulous Americans who happen to be Hispanic, to serve our country.  Everybody
has got to have a good lawyer.  (Laughter and applause.)  Mi abogado es
magnifico.  (Laughter.)  And I want to thank Al Gonzales for his friendship.
There's no better advisor.  He's a steady hand who knows the law, and he's doing
a great, great job for the country.  (Applause.)

     Ruben Barrales, who runs a very key department here in the White House.  I
know you're going to hear from Ruben, if you haven't already.  He's a good,
young star, and a fine guy.  Rosario Marin is the Treasurer of the United
States.  Rosario, thank you for coming.  I appreciate you being here.
(Applause.)  If you're interested in finding good examples of people who have
won and who have served with distinction, you need to look no farther than two
from Florida and one from Texas -- (laughter) -- Congressman Henry Bonilla, who
is a fine, fine -- (applause) -- and of course, Lincoln Diaz-Balart, y tambien,
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.  I appreciate you all for coming.  (Applause.)

     And I see you brought along Mario, tu hermano.  (Laughter.)  Mario, it's
good to see you again.  Mario Diaz-Balart is a state rep out of the state of
Florida, a fine member of the delegation.  He's a popular -- not only a popular
candidate, but a popular public servant.  And he takes his instructions from his
brother.  (Laughter.)  Actually from his mother.  (Laughter.)  Dora Irizarry is
here.  She is a candidate for the Attorney General of the state of New York.
Dora, good luck, buneas suerte.  Thanks for coming.  (Applause.)

     We've got a lot of other great candidates, none other than the next
governor of the state of New Mexico, Juan Sanchez.  Thank you for coming, John.
(Applause.)  I would spend all my time heralding those of you in the legislative
branch or in the executive branch, but I've got some other things on my mind.

     But before I do, I also want to make sure there is diversity in the
judicial branch.  I have named a really good man to the bench, the D.C. Circuit
Court of Appeals, named Miguel Estrada.  And I expect the United States Senate
to treat this man with respect.  I don't want to see the same thing that
happened to some of my other candidates, in that they distort his record.  I
don't want them to distort his record like they did Ms. Owen's or Mr. Pickering.
For the sake of a good, strong federal bench, for the sake of recognizing this
man's intelligence and his capabilities, the Senate needs to confirm Miguel
Estrada.  (Applause.)

     Let me share some things that are on my mind, things that I've spent a lot
of time thinking about.  First is jobs.  I think a lot -- I spend a lot of time
thinking about jobs here in America.  I want people to find work.  I want people
to be able to put bread on the table.  I want this country to continue to
promote policies that encourage job growth.  That's what we ought to be asking
here in Washington, what can we do to encourage there to be job growth.

     The economy is not like it should be.  There are some encouraging signs.
Of course, interest rates are low, inflation is low, productivity amongst our
workers and producers is the best in the world, and that's incredibly positive.

     The foundation for growth is there.  The foundation was somewhat troubled
by the fact that we had some of our corporate citizens decide they weren't going
to tell the truth, they fudged the numbers to deceive shareholder and employee
alike.  We're taking care of that.  I've signed the most comprehensive corporate
reform since Franklin Roosevelt was the President.  You might have noticed
yesterday, people are being brought to justice here in America.  We expect there
to be corporate responsibility in America, and we will enforce the law to make
sure there is corporate responsibility in America.

     We're also dealing with things here in Congress to help people have more
money.  We believe very strongly that when a person has more money in his or her
pocket, it is more likely to increase the job base, because if you have more
money, you demand a good or a service.  When you demand a good or a service,
somebody will produce the good or a service.  And when somebody produces a good
or a service, somebody is more likely to find work.

     Tax relief was incredibly important at this moment in our American history.
Tax relief will help stimulate job growth because it helped stimulate the growth
of small businesses.  There are a lot of Latino-owned small businesses in
America.  One of the great success stories about our economy and about our
nation is the fact that a lot of people realize their dreams through owning
their own business.  One of the fastest growing sectors of small business in the
country is Latino-owned businesses.  And the tax relief plan was really good for
small businesses here in America.  And the Congress needs to make them
permanent.  (Applause.)

     In order to make sure that we grow our economy, we've got to make sure
Congress doesn't overspend.  The Senate doesn't even have a budget.  If you
don't have a budget, it makes it hard to be fiscally sound with the people's
money.  Sometimes here in Washington, people forget whose money we spend.  See,
they think it's the government's money.  It's not; it's the people's money.  And
we've got to be sound when we spend the people's money.  We ought to fund
priorities.  But as they head out of town, the Congress must not overspend.  For
the sake of job creation and job growth, they must be realistic with the
people's money.

     I submitted a budget that will get us to balance, a budget that if there's
fiscal discipline, we can get back to balance.  And Congress needs to not only
remember whose money they spend, but Congress must not overspend on their -- as
they're trying to get out of town.

     And, finally, there are some things that we can do here to create jobs for
working people.  We need to have a terrorism insurance package.  You see,
there's a lot of folks that cannot get insurance, a lot of construction programs
that aren't going forward because people can't get insurance, because of what
the terrorists did.

     It's estimated there's over 300,000 hard hats that could be working,
300,000 hard hat jobs that are delayed.  Those are our fellow Americans who
aren't getting the chance to employ their skills.  This afternoon, I'm going to
be talking about this issue more.  But if Congress truly is interested in
joining with me to do everything we can to expand the job base, they need to get
a terrorism insurance package before they go home.  It's good for the hard hats
of America.  (Applause.)

     The security of the country is on my mind, too.  See, there's an enemy
which still hates America, and they want to hit us.  It's just reality.  And,
therefore, we've got to do everything we can to protect the homeland.  I spend a
lot of time worrying about the job security of the American people.  I spend a
lot of time worrying about the homeland security of the American people as well.
It's my number one priority right now as the President, to protect our homeland.

     We must do everything we can to protect innocent life here at home.  I'm
sure people have -- have asked you, you know, why -- why would the enemy hate
America?  Your kids are probably saying, why would they hate America?  And
you've got to tell them it's because they hate us for what we love.  We love
freedom.  We love the freedom to worship the way we see fit.  We love the
freedom to speak our mind.  We love the freedom to campaign.  We love the
freedom of the press.  We love all our freedoms.  We love our diversity.  We
love the fact that God has created people equal.  We love that.  We value life
in America.  Everybody is precious, everybody has worth, everybody counts.  And
we're not changing our mind about those values and our freedom.

     The enemy hates freedom, they hate innocent life.  They are willing to take
innocent life and, at the same time, hijack a great religion.  And so long as
they are out there, we must do everything we can to defend the homeland.

     Which means I need the capacity here in Washington to assure the American
people that the good folks at the federal level are doing everything they can to
protect you.  There's over a hundred agencies involved with homeland security,
and so I decided in order to make the protection of the homeland the number one
priority, that we ought to bundle all those up to the extent possible and put
them under one agency, so that there is authority and responsibility; so that we
can set the legacy for future Presidents to be able to better protect the

     And we're having a pretty good debate here in Washington.  The House of
Representatives thankfully passed a bill that is a good bill.  The Senate is
still struggling with the bill.  They need to get it done before they go home.
The -- let me just tell you what the problem is, so you can get a sense of why I
have some frustrations with what is taking place in the Senate.

     First of all, the frontline troops, the employees who are working on your
behalf, are really good people -- good, honorable, hard-working people.  And
they are people that the morale of which is going to be in the interest of any
President or any Secretary of Homeland Security.  In other words, we've got to
make sure that morale is high in order for us to better do our jobs.  So there
should be no question in any employee's mind about the intentions of a President
or a future President that we want people to have job satisfaction in order to
be able to do the job.

     But we also need to have the authority necessary to succeed in the critical
mission.  We've got to have the ability to put the right people at the right
place at the right time in order to protect America.

     Many of you come from border communities or border states.  You know full
well that on our borders, there's three different agencies involved with
protecting the border.  Agencies of good, hardworking people, but sometimes
agencies with different strategies and different approaches.  And sometimes
those different strategies and different approaches can promote gaps in
security.  And we've got to have the capacity to do everything we can to protect
the American people from somebody who would want to bring a weapon into our
country, for example.

     In other words, we've got to be able to let the hardworking people in these
agencies better do their job.  We can't be constrained by work rules that
prevent us from doing a better job, and that's the debate.

     The Senate and some members of the Senate want to deny this President and
future Presidents the authority of -- the ability to protect our national
security; the ability in some cases to suspend collective bargaining for the
sake of national security.  That ability has been granted from Jimmy Carter on.
President Kennedy had the authority.  Jimmy Carter was President when they
codified it into law.

     It doesn't make any sense, in a time of war, to take away that part of the
Presidential authority.  It just doesn't make any sense to me.  It's very
important that the President have the capacity to determine that vital national
security interests take priority over standard rules governing management and
labor relations.

     What's really interesting is that if this authority is not applied to the
Department of Homeland Security, it still will be applied to departments such as
the Department of Education, or the Department of Agriculture.  Those are vital
departments -- but does it make sense to allow the authority to exist in the
Department of Agriculture, but not in the new Department of Homeland Security?
Of course it doesn't make any sense.  And that's why the Senate must be
realistic and reasonable as it approaches this very important issue about how to
leave a legacy of homeland security in place.

     I will not accept a rollback in the authority that other Presidents have
had.  And the Senate must understand that.  The Senate must understand that I
have a duty not only to protect the American people, but a duty to protect the
prerogatives of the President.  If it's good enough for the Department of
Agriculture, if this authority is good enough for the employees of the
Department of Education or HHS, it certainly should be good enough for the
Department of Homeland Security.  (Applause.)

     We need flexibility to deal with emerging threats.  The Customs Service,
for example, decided to require inspectors at the nation's 301 ports to wear
radiation-detection devices.  The world changed; we are worried about weapons of
mass destruction coming into our country.  And so the Customs Service said, why
don't we have our folks wear radiation-detection devices to be able to pick up
any possible signal?

     The devices work, and they're an important part of somebody being able to
do their job.  Under the rules that some Senators support, the union that
represents the Customs would be able to say, you can't do that, that must be
voluntary.  For the -- that doesn't make any sense to me, that we not -- that we
have to work through a process that would enable our hardworking Customs
officials to be able to do that which they think is necessary to protect
America.  And we can't afford sitting around for a year debating whether or not
wearing devices ought to be voluntary or not.

     Collective bargaining is important, I support the idea of workers being
able to have collective bargaining.  But we need to be able to manage the new
agency, so that we can best protect the American people.  And I call upon the
Senate to understand the importance of what I just said.  (Applause.)

     The best way to protect America is to hunt the killers down, one at a time.
And that's what we're going to do.  This is a different kind of war.  It is a
war which is not going to be measured in terms of territories gained or tanks
destroyed or flotilla destroyed.  It's a war in which we're going through an
international manhunt, one killer at a time, and bringing people to justice.

     Which means it's essential we continue to uphold the doctrine that says:
either you're with us or you're with them.  And that doctrine still stands, and
there's a lot of really fine countries, with good leaders, working with us to
find these killers and to bring them to justice.  And we're just doing just
that.  Sometimes you'll read about it, sometimes you won't read about it.
That's the kind of war this is.  Sometimes there's achievements that they'll be
blasting out over the cables, and people will be talking about it forever, and
sometimes you just won't know what's taking place.  But you've got to know,
we're making progress.

     We've hauled in over a couple of thousand of these.  We got a guy the other
day who popped his head up, and is now no longer a threat to America.  He's the
one that was going to be the 20th hijacker, and he's no longer available for
action with the enemy.  (Applause.)  It takes a lot of work, it takes a lot of
work.  It takes a strong military.  And for those of you who have got loved ones
in the military, you've got to know, I've got great confidence in our troops.
And I want to thank you for your service and I want to thank you for their

     And the United States Congress must get a defense appropriations bill to my
desk before they go home.  I asked for the largest increase in defense spending
since President Reagan was the President, because I want our troops to have the
best pay, the best training, and best possible equipment.  And I want to send a
message to the world:  when it comes to the defense of our freedom, there's no
artificial time line.  When it comes to defending America, civilization, the
ability for our children to grow up in a free society, it doesn't matter how
long it takes.  This great nation will stay the course.  (Applause.)

     So I expect there to be a defense bill on my desk.  I know that members of
the House and Senate are working hard to reconcile their differences and I
appreciate that.  There needs to be a bill on my desk before they go home.
There's going to be an important message to determine -- important message we
send to the world.

     And so we're making progress on that front of the war against terror.  But
there are other fronts on the war against terror that we must deal with.  We
must deal with countries run by people who are some of the world's worst
leaders, who harbor, develop, want to hurt us with the world's worst weapons.
That's a form of terror.

     The war on terror is more than just al Qaeda.  The war on terror is to deal
with nations who have terrorized their own people and have intention to
terrorize us.  See, oceans no longer protect us.  There's a new era in America.
There's a new threat that faces us.  And we've got to deal with these threats.
I made the decision to deal with these -- the threat of Iraq in an international
community.  I've called upon other nations to join us, and there will be other
nations joining us to help disarm Iraq.

     We'll determine whether or not the U.N. Security Council wants to live up
to its obligations.  After all, for 11 long years the dictator in Iraq, the man
who has gassed his own people, gassed people in his neighborhood, the man who's
expressly -- expressed his hatred for America and our friends and allies --
we'll see whether or not the United Nations will be the United Nations or the
League of Nations when it comes to dealing with this man who for 11 years has
thumbed his nose at resolution after resolution after resolution after

     My intent, of course, is for the United Nations to do its job.  I think
it'll make it easier for us to keep the peace.  My intent is for the world to
understand that the obligation is up to Saddam Hussein to disarm like he said he
would do.  My intent is to put together a vast coalition of countries who
understand the threat of Saddam Hussein.

     The military option is my last choice, not my first.  It's my last choice.
But Saddam has got to understand, the United Nations must know, that the will of
this country is strong.

     Yesterday, I had the honor of standing on the steps of the White House, at
the Rose Garden.  Republican leader and Democrat leader alike -- Speaker Hastert
and Leader Gephardt, Trent Lott and Joe Lieberman, John McCain and Evan Bayh,
member after member -- who have committed to join with the administration to
send a clear signal that when it comes to defending our freedom, the United
States of America will stand united and stand strong.

     The choice is up to the United Nations to show its resolve.  The choice is
up to Saddam Hussein to fulfill its word -- his word.  And if neither of them
acts, the United States, in deliberate fashion, will lead a coalition to take
away the world's worst weapons from one of the world's worst leaders.

     I say that because I have a deep desire for peace, peace in America, peace
in the Middle East.  I believe peace is possible.  I believe that out of the
evil done to America can come some really -- some good.  And one of the good is
international peace, I believe that.

     And, therefore, I will continue to speak clearly about good and evil,
continue to renounce terrorism in any form, continue to lead the world toward
peace, peace not only for ourselves, but because we value all human life, peace
in parts of the world that have given up on peace.

     I know at home we can be a better country, too.  The great country of ours
must recognize there are pockets of despair and hopelessness in America.
Amongst our plenty, there are people who hurt.  So long as any of us hurt, we
all should hurt.  But I believe that this country can solve any problem put in
its path, and one of those is to help inspire all Americans to understand the
greatness of this country.

     One way to do so, to make a better country, is to make sure that everybody
is educated.  I passed a really good bill with the Congress, and signed a really
good bill.  They passed it, I signed it.  (Laughter.)  I worked with them.  And
it says this, every child can learn, see.  Every child can learn.  And this
country will challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations.  (Applause.)  This
plan recognizes it's so easy to quit on children whose parents may not speak
English as a first language.  It's easy just to shuffle them through, say, you
know, these kids can't learn, move them through.

     We insist upon strong accountability.  If you receive federal money, you've
got to measure, because we believe every child can learn.  (Applause.)  And
therefore, we want to know, we want to know.  We must have the courage as
citizens of the country to blow the whistle on failure when we find our children
trapped in schools which will not teach and will not change.

     A better America is one that takes care of our seniors, with a good health
care system.  Medicine has changed, Medicare hasn't.  Medicine has changed, and
yet the old system hasn't changed with it.  And we've got to change Medicare.
For the good of our seniors, we need prescription drug benefits for our seniors.
We need a modern Medicare system.

     But the best way to change America is for America to really rely upon the
true strength of the country, which is the people of the country.  See,
government can hand out money, but it cannot put love in people's hearts, or a
sense of purpose in people's lives.  That is done when one of our fellow
citizens finds somebody who hurts and puts their arm around him or her, and
says, I love you, what can I do to help you, what can I do to make sure you
understand the American Dream is meant for you?   That could be mentoring a
child, teaching a child to read, that could be running a Boy Scout or Girl Scout
troop, teaching a child values, that could be making sure somebody has got food
if they're hungry.

     See, the great strength of America is the heart and soul of the people of
this country.  And so what's happened is, and it seems like to me, is that the
evil ones hit us -- america took a step back, and said, in order to fight evil,
we all must do some good.  And my call to the fellow -- my fellow Americans is,
love somebody just like you'd like to be loved yourself; that if you're
interested in fighting the evil done to us, it doesn't take much, just a small
act of kindness and generosity on a daily basis.

     And it's that gathering momentum of the millions of acts of kindness and
generosity and compassion which takes place in America that truly defines the
character of this nation.

     I want to thank you all for serving this nation.  May God bless you all and
may God bless America. 







Send mail to webmaster@wrnha.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright 2004 Washington Republican National Hispanic Assembly
Last modified: 04/24/03